Realism and Idealism in International Relations Essay

world and Idealism in International Relations - Essay mannikinIt was from this source where the cynicism of the idea that th ends justifies the means first saw their origins. The ideas of Modern Realism took root in the ideas of Hans Mogenthau who laid out the principles of Modern Realism. Before proceeding further it is important to underline some of the ideas of Realism in a more fully expanded form.Realism operates under the underlying assumption that the in there is no over riding sense of order and justice governing international states. In other words there is a sense of international anarchy which can only be kept in check by individual states acting in their own self interests to bear on control and authority over their own national borders. Sovereign states in these conditions therefore act to beef up their own relative position in regard to their competitors. In this scenario the problems of conflict arise when states acting in their own interest become federal agencyf ul and threaten the security of their neighbors. In this shifting balance of power there is a pattern of alliances that occur. Hans Mogenthau in his seminal work Politics among Nations laid out a group of certain principles that he believed outlined the ideas of Realism. He argued that power was the main currency between nations. semipolitical actions of states were therefore governed by this need to acquire power. This was a rational impulse which could be understood in terms of recognizable patterns. The important distinction he made from earlier ideas was that ethical motive was irrelevant. It was non that states were profligate but rather that they were amoral, because in being guided by the pursuit of power relations, morality compete little role. Mogenthaus ideas are now often seen in conjunction with the thoughts of another influential judgement in... It was not that states were immoral but rather that they were amoral, because in being guided by the pursuit of power rel ations, morality played little role. Mogenthaus ideas are now often seen in conjunction with the thoughts of another influential thinker in the field at the time, Rhinehold Niebuhr. Both theorists ideas grew out of the darker realities witnessed in the aftermath of World War II and the Cold War that followed. Observing the dangers of the escalating scale of nuclear armament throughout the Cold War both thinkers espoused what has come to be seen as Classical Realism where they warned against the dangers of a dual balance of power as was seen between the Soviet Union and the United States. Not all shared the distrust of the the bipolar conjecture of balance of power. Kenneth Waltz argued for the very bipolar balance of power that the previous two thinkers resisted. Kenneth Waltz center on the anarchy among satellite states and called for that bipolar framework of power which allowed states to balance their interests in terms of substantially defined allegiances. Because this theor y tended to remove the behavioral aspects out of the framework of the argument it tended to be known as the Neoclassical Realist Approach as it looked at structural determinants rather than strictly focusing on the have to acquire power as a behavioral expectation of individuals, and by extension states.